Top Tens – TV: Top 10 Fantasy & SF TV Series (8) Fantasy: Sweet Home

Netflix promotional poster art

 

 

(8) FANTASY: SWEET HOME

(2020 – 2024: SEASONS 1-3)

 

Monster apocalypse!

Adapted from a webtoon, apocalyptic horror hits South Korea, as people turn into monsters inside and outside an apartment building – with the second and third season expanding the setting from the original building, as well as featuring the remnants of the army and government studying the monsters in hope of finding a cure.

It’s distinct from a zombie apocalypse – as while the transformations have symptoms of onset, the transformations themselves are not contagious and don’t have the qualities of viral infection of your standard zombie apocalypse. Also, the monster transformations are metaphysical or even karmic in nature, usually reflecting some character trait in the person being transformed. Hence, some monsters are more monstrous than others, in appearance or in morality.

I mean, the first episode sets the tone with the series protagonist hears his neighbor complaining she’s hungry as she eats his ramen (ransacked from the package delivery outside his door) – and her cat.

 

FANTASY OR SF?

 

Unlike a zombie apocalypse which usually is more SF than fantasy, the monster apocalypse is a little too metaphysical for SF and so I’ve ranked it as fantasy. However, it still retains some SF trappings, for being set in the contemporary world with the government or military trying to study the monsters for a possible cure.

 

HORROR

 

What part of monster apocalypse did you miss? You can pretty much rank it as straight-up horror.

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

B-TIER (HIGH TIER)

Top Tens – Film: Top 10 Fantasy & SF Films: (8) SF: Back to the Future

Classic promotional poster art for the first film

 

 

(8) SF: BACK TO THE FUTURE

(1985-1990: BACK TO THE FUTURE 1-3)

 

“If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you’re gonna see some serious sh*t.”

Alternatively, “McFly!”

One of the two definitive SF time travel franchises of all time – as per South Park, “Terminator rules” are that time travel is “one way only and you can’t go back”, in contrast with “Back to the Future rules, where back and forth is possible”. The other distinction is the mutability of time in the latter as opposed to the former – or to put it simply, you can change the past in the latter, for better or worse. Which in my opinion makes for the more entertaining franchise for the actual time travel – combining “fish out of water comedy with high-stakes drama, making deft use of threatened temporal paradox” (not to mention running gags based on similar events across time) and shuttling back and forth 30 years before and after 1985 as well as a century into the past.

The first film in the trilogy is the best, setting the basic themes and tropes for the sequels to follow:

“Marty McFly, a teenager from 1985, accidentally sends himself to 1955 in the time machine Doc Brown built out of a DeLorean, and requires 1.21 gigawatts of power to return home. After initial confusion, the 1955 Doc Brown agrees to help Marty get back home by striking his car with 1.21 gigawatts of lightning, giving Marty a week to make his parents fall back in love at a dance and put bully Biff Tannen in his place”

Not to mention inventing rock ‘n’ roll…

 

FANTASY OR SF?

 

Again, it’s obviously SF – one of the definitive SF time travel film franchises! Although time travel can work as a fantasy trope – and I do like it whenever it pops up in fantasy, although it is perhaps more limited in fantasy use because of its potential story-breaking power if done by means of magic controlled by a character or protagonist.

 

HORROR

 

Unusually for fantasy or SF, virtually no element of horror – unless you count the existential horror of erasing yourself from existence by changing the past….

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

A-TIER (TOP TIER)

Top Tens – History (WW2): Top 10 Second World Wars (Special Mention) (6) Demographic War – Deportation, Displacement & Expulsions

German language areas in Poland, Czechia, Kaliningrad Oblast (Russia – formerly East Prussia), and Lithuania before expulsion of Germans (with green as completely German and yellow as ethnically mixed areas) – public domain image

 

 

(6) DEMOGRAPHIC WAR –

DEPORTATION, DISPLACEMENT & EXPULSIONS

(1939-1948)

 

“The Second World War caused the movement of the largest number of people in the shortest period of time in history.”

Of course, much of this movement was what might be described as ‘conventional’ refugees, caused by or fleeing from hostilities, from the Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1931 onwards.

However, much of it was what might be described as demographic war – “mass evacuation, forced displacement, expulsion, and deportation of millions of people…enforced by the former Axis and the Allied powers…Belligerents on both sides engaged in forms of expulsion of people perceived as being associated with the enemy”.

Or just simply the enemy, targeted in a form of demographic warfare or in modern parlance, ethnic cleansing. We’ve already looked at the best known example of this in my special mention for the Holocaust – a primary component of which was the deportation of the Jewish population within Europe, as the preliminary step to something more…final.

That also illustrates the major location for demographic warfare was central and eastern Europe. The movement of people in more targeted expulsions than as refugees commenced with the German invasion of Poland in September 1939 – on both sides of the line of Nazi and Soviet occupation. Both the Germans and Soviets expelled Poles in similar numbers – with the Germans expelling more 1.6 to 2 million Poles, not including “millions of slave laborers deported from Poland to the Reich”, while the Soviets expelled over 1.5 million Poles.

The Soviets were then the leaders in expulsions, either to secure the territory secured under the Nazi-Soviet Pact – Finns, Latvians, Estonians and Lithuanians – or as ‘defensive’ measures against ethnic populations potentially aligned with the Germans. The latter involved the Soviets deporting ethnic populations from European Russia to Siberia, Central Asia or more remote areas of the Soviet Union – perhaps most famously the Volga Germans and Crimean Tartars, but also “Kalmyks, Chechens, Ingush, Balkars, Karachays and Meskehtian Turks”. Many of these were in 1943-1944, arguably  well after the time of any ‘defensive’ emergency had passed.

The United States infamously had its own version of internal deportation with the internment of Japanese-Americans.

Elsewhere the Balkans was the scene of ongoing demographic warfare or outright ethnic cleansing, most well known of which was that of the Serbs from Croatia and Bosnia in Axis-occupied Yugoslavia.

However, one of the largest but still least well known expulsions came at the end and in the aftermath of the Second World War in Europe – the flight and expulsion of Germans from central and eastern Europe, either of Germany minority populations from other countries, now seen as the vanguard or at least casus belli of German aggression against those countries, or Germans from former German territory now ceded to other states, notably East Prussia to the Soviet Union and other eastern German territory to Poland.

“Between 13.5 and 16.5 million German-speakers fled, were evacuated or later expelled from Central and Eastern Europe”. The primary parties responsible for the post-war expulsions were of the new governments of the central or eastern European states formerly occupied by or allied to Germany – and behind them of course Stalin’s Soviet Union – but the western Allies had agreed in principle to such expulsions provided they were carried out in a way that was “orderly and humane”.

Sadly, they were not – with estimates of the number of those who died during or from them ranging from half a million to two or even three million.

While the western Allies played no active part in the post-war expulsion of Germans, except of course to receive them as refugees in their occupation zones in West Germany or Austria, they did notoriously play an active role in the postwar repatriation of Russian Cossacks taken as prisoners of war to a grim fate in the Soviet Union.

 

 

RATING: 4 STARS****

A-TIER (TOP TIER)

Top Tens – Mythology: Top 10 Books (Honorable Mention: Bible & Biblical Mythology)

Michelangelo’s Pieta, St Peter’s Basilica, Vatican City – photograph donated to public domain

 

TOP 10 MYTHOLOGY BOOKS (HONORABLE MENTION: BIBLE & BIBLICAL MYTHOLOGY)

 

That’s right – I don’t just have a top ten mythology books, or my usual twenty special mentions. I also have honorable mentions.

My usual rule is that I have no cap on the number of individual entries I can list as honorable mention for any given top ten if there are enough entries beyond my top ten or special mentions – and I tend to just list them in chronological or date order, usually date of publication for books.

However, for mythology books, I have some different rules, except the lack of any cap or numerical limit on honorable mention.

My primary rule is that I have honorable mentions for books in selected subjects of mythology, where there are enough entries for that subject (potentially racking them up for a top ten in that subject) – as here, with the subject of the Bible and Biblical mythology.

And where I have honorable mentions for particular subjects, I quickly recap the entries on that subject from my top ten or special mentions first before moving on to my further honorable mentions, in tier rankings and numerical sequence albeit with some degree or chronological or date order.

 

S-TIER (GOD TIER)

TO RECAP BIBLICAL ENTRIES FROM MY TOP 10 MYTHOLOGY BOOKS (INCLUDING THE PRIMARY SOURCE OF THE BIBLE ITSELF)

 

 

The title page to the 1611 first edition of the King James Bible

 

(1) BIBLE

 

Obviously the primary source for Biblical mythology or other Biblical subjects, as well as top place entry in my Top 10 Mythology Books with Biblical mythology also in top spot in my Top 10 Mythologies – and those entries go into more detail.

This is the big one – genesis and apocalypse, alpha and omega, allelujah and amen!

 

RATING: 5 STARS*****
S-TIER (GOD TIER – WHAT ELSE?)

 

 

 

(2) BARBARA WALKER – WOMEN’S ENCYCLOPEDIA OF MYTHS & SECRETS (1983)

 

She is the goddess and this is her body!

And this book is also third place entry in my Top 10 Mythology Books, where you can read more detail about it there.

While the book is essentially comparative mythology to variations on the theme of goddesses or the goddess, it has a substantial number of its encyclopedia on Biblical subjects or broader subjects within Jewish or Christian folklore.

 

RATING: 5 STARS*****
S-TIER (GOD TIER – OR IS THAT GODDESS-TIER?)

 

A-TIER (TOP TIER)

TO RECAP BIBLICAL ENTRIES FROM MY TOP 10 MYTHOLOGY BOOKS (SPECIAL MENTION)

 

 

 

 

(3) JONATHAN KIRSCH –

THE HARLOT BY THE SIDE OF THE ROAD / A HISTORY OF THE END OF THE WORLD (1998 / 2006)

 

My personal favorite book of the Bible is the Book of Apocalypse, or as I like to call it, Babylon and the Beast – hence my special mention for Jonathan Kirsch, who wrote about it in A History of the End of the World.

It doesn’t stop there. As I like to quip, it’s the book that doesn’t stop giving, even after you stop believing – and Jonathan Kirsch is the author of some of my favorite studies of the Bible. Not of the whole Bible, mind you – for one thing, he tends towards a Jewish focus on the Old Testament (with that one notable exception for the Book of Apocalypse).

There’s his first such book, The Harlot by the Side of the Road, for which the subtitle says it all – Forbidden Tales of the Bible.

There’s his books on Moses and King David respectively, arguably the two leading figures of the Old Testament – well, apart from God.

And there’s his books on subjects not so much from Biblical mythology but Biblical religion – such as his book God Against the Gods, as stated in its subtitle, a history of the war between monotheism and polytheism (in the Roman Empire).

 

RATING:
A-TIER (TOP TIER)

 

HONORABLE MENTION 

A-TIER (TOP TIER)

 

Harper Perennial edition 1983

 

 

(4) MANFRED BARTHEL –

WHAT THE BIBLE REALLY SAYS (1982)

 

This book is summed up in its subtitle, “casting new light on the book of books” – or as per the longer blurb or precis this edition (which is the one I have) has on its front cover for some reason, “fascinating archaeological discoveries and surprising new translations are enriching our understanding of what the Bible really says. Here readers of all religious persuasions will find fresh insights to illuminate and make the Bible more meaningful and exciting reading”.

Given the book was published in 1982, that light is not so new anymore but it remains highly, well, illuminating. I’m not so sure about “readers of all religious persuasions”, or the Bible as “exciting reading” for that matter – as I like to quip, the Bible may be the Word of God but in that case He needed a good editor. Barthel is forthright from the outset that any serious study of the Bible has to abandon any notions of fundamentalism or literalism – that the Bible is literally true in every aspect. However, those inclined to skepticism towards any historicity in the Bible may find their views challenged almost as much.

What the Bible Really Says is the source of my hot take about the Bible, to antagonize both believers and skeptics – that the Bible is a lot less historical than fundamentalist believers usually maintain, but more historical than skeptics usually give it credit.

Among other things, it proposes more naturalistic explanations of apparently supernatural miracles. For example, it queries that people have proposed all sorts of different explanations, allegorical or otherwise, for the burning bush, until only recently thinking to ask a botanist whether there was a plant capable of matching that description. And indeed there is – a species of plant that accumulates an oil on its leaves, which can then ignite in the sun and burn off, harmlessly without affecting the leaf or plant.

And so on – with little interpretative nuggets like that throughout the book, literally from genesis to apocalypse.

 

RATING:
A-TIER (TOP TIER)

 

 

(5) IAN JONES –

JOSHUA, THE MAN THEY CALLED JESUS (1999)

 

This honorable mention essentially reflects a narrower subset within the subject of the Bible and Biblical mythology for Jesus as the most prominent Biblical figure in my reading, reflecting the prolific number of books on him. That’s particularly for analysis or studies of what is often termed the historical Jesus (as opposed to the mythic or religious Christ). Essentially we’re talking historical biography as best can be parsed or reconstructed from the available sources, primarily the Gospels.

Funnily enough, this book remains one of my favorite historical biographies of Jesus – essentially Jesus and his disciples as Ned Kelly and the Kelly Gang!

No, really – but not literally, although I’d love to see the latter. This biography of Jesus sticks out like a sore thumb from Jones’ bibliography that is almost entirely about Australian outlaw bushranger Ned Kelly and his Kelly Gang. But you know what? It works.

For all that the specialty of Jones, an Australian writer, was Ned Kelly and the Kelly Gang, it would seem that adapted well to constructing a historical biography of a figure from layers of legend and reverence from sources originating from that figure’s followers.

Jones even makes a reference to this effect in his introduction to this book, saying that in his youth he argued with a priest that using the Gospels as the source of a historical biography of Jesus was like using the closest members of the Kelly Gang as your source about Ned Kelly – an argument he admits he finds embarrassing now for its lack of tact.

Lack of tact perhaps but not a bad approach for gleaning nuggets of fact from legend – or glowing hagiography, although messianography might be a better word in this case. Although as Jones notes from the outset, the Gospels were not actually written by the disciples for whom they are named, albeit he advocates the Gospel of John has consistent signs of originating from a source close to the historical Jesus, perhaps not unlike the favorite disciple for whom it is named.

This book remains my favorite such historical biography of Jesus, in part due to a deft prose style, and one of the biggest influences for my view of the Jesus in the Gospels essentially as a (tragic) figure of what I dub the great messianic ghost dance.

 

RATING:

A-TIER (TOP TIER)

*

*

HONORABLE MENTION 

B-TIER (HIGH TIER)

 

 

 

 

(6) DONALD ATTWATER –

PENGUIN DICTIONARY OF SAINTS (1938)

 

Exactly what it says on the tin, except that it originated from the Dictionary of Saints by British Catholic author Donald Attwater in 1938, hence the date for my honorable mention. It was apparently revised as the Penguin Dictionary of Saints in various editions since.

Saints are one of the most prolific elements of Christian folklore, particularly within Catholicism. The most fundamental saints are those within the New Testament, notably the apostles and other figures directly associated with Jesus in the Gospels – although one of the most fundamental, St Paul, was never directly associated with Jesus as a person rather than through visions. Indeed, the writers of the books of the New Testament (as attributed or nominated) have also all been sainted.

Beyond the Bible (as there are Christian saints drawn from the Old Testament as well as the New), there is a plethora of saints, ranging from mythic to historic figures. Saints of course overlap with martyrs – those killed for their faith – and both overlap with relics.

Saints are so prolific that I’ve always been reminded of the observation of John Ralston Saul that for a religion that is identified as monotheistic, Christianity has moved through the trinity of its godhead with a potential fourth divine figure in Mary to the twelve apostles and such a plethora of saints that it rivals the polytheism of Hinduism. (To which Saul might well have added a comparison to the classical paganism that probably inspired the proliferation of saints, at least in part, what with its various levels of gods through to demi-hemi-semi-gods).

 

RATING:

B-TIER (HIGH TIER)

 

 

 

(7) GUSTAV DAVIDSON –

A DICTIONARY OF ANGELS (1967)

*

Again, exactly what it says on the tin.

Which is harder than you might think, given how few angels are actually named in the Bible – even if you count, as this dictionary does, the fallen angels, or where the use of star connotes an angel as with Star Wormwood in the Book of Apocalypse.

In fairness, the book admits as much in its introduction – so it teases out all canonical references to angels and ranges through non-canonical or extra-biblical writings and folklore.

 

RATING:

B-TIER (HIGH TIER)

*

HONORABLE MENTION

X-TIER (WEIRD / WILD TIER)

*

*

(8) TIMOTHY FREKE & PETER GANDY –

THE JESUS MYSTERIES: WAS THE ORIGINAL JESUS A PAGAN GOD?

 

Given how prolific books about Jesus are, it is not surprising that there are books with theories about Jesus that are, shall we say, a bit out there – or indeed, a lot out there.

I suppose this arises from the uncertainty about him as a historical figure. While the consensus of scholarship (and my own opinion) is that he was a historical person, many or perhaps most, if not all, of the details of his historical biography are up for debate, often highly contested.

That does extend to whether he was a historical person at all as opposed to an entirely mythic figure, with theories of the latter often dubbed the Christ myth theory – albeit a minority viewpoint. However, it is this viewpoint that has the most fringe theories – indeed, with some very wild theories indeed. That includes the theory of John Allegro in The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross of Jesus as magic mushroom and the theory of Joseph Atwill in Caesar’s Messiah of Jesus as creation of imperial Roman propaganda.

And then there’s this book, which proposes Jesus was not a historical person but essentially a syncretic creation or re-interpretation of a long line of dying-and-rising pagan divine figures worshipped in “mystery cults” from Osiris to Dionysus (such that the authors even label the generic figure as Osiris-Dionysus). As the authors quote a historian, from a historical perspective, Christianity is a Greek hero cult devoted to a Jewish Messiah. The authors attribute this syncretic creation to gnostic Christians, whom they identify as the original Christians as opposed to subsequent ‘literalist’ Christians.

I don’t buy their Jesus Mysteries thesis – few people do, and many have been quite caustic in their criticism, even other proponents of the Jesus myth theory – but you can’t deny it’s a hoot.

 

RATING:

X-TIER (WEIRD / WILD TIER)